Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Chaos

ATTN: BMD and K teams

Recommended Posts

There's some cards talking about why missile defense is bad from Bataille's philosophy on opencaselist10. I don't have the link and I don't remember who ran this, but the cards mentioned "Star Wars" as well. This could probably make a sweet end of season affirmative with only a little bit of work.

 

You're welcome.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://opencaselist10.wikispaces.com/Gonzaga+CJ+%28Abe+Corrigan+%26+James+Joseph%29+-+AFF

 

this is the only thing i could find after searching "star wars" that closely resembled your description. at first glance, and this jives with my instinct, seems like bataille would probably think star wars is bad.

This is it, and yes, he's saying star wars bad. It's meant for the aff to use. It uses Star Wars and BMD interchangeably, and the reasons that Star Wars is bad all apply to BMD.

 

It's not enough on its own to be a good case, but with some work it could be. I don't think that very many people have been reading Bataille this year, so this could catch them off guard, and they probably wouldn't understand his philosophy well enough to answer it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is it, and yes, he's saying star wars bad. It's meant for the aff to use. It uses Star Wars and BMD interchangeably, and the reasons that Star Wars is bad all apply to BMD.

 

It's not enough on its own to be a good case, but with some work it could be. I don't think that very many people have been reading Bataille this year, so this could catch them off guard, and they probably wouldn't understand his philosophy well enough to answer it.

 

I feel like it would be way more work than it's worth to develop this into an aff. The cards are just saying like "missiles bad" - on this topic it'd be damn hard to have the aff solve it. How does withdrawing "missile defense presence from Japan" or "ending missile defense cooperation" or whatever solve the existence of the missiles (which is what the cards are talking about)? How does it solve other missile defense systems that we or other countries have deployed?

 

It could theoretically be developed around a TNWs aff maybe. But I feel like that'd still be tenuous.

 

Yͨ̈́ͮ̊̎̓o̝̰̾ͫͮ͂̔̔͡u͚̗̱ͣ̇̾̚rͧ̑ͯ͋̒̔̚҉͎̦͕̫̪ ͓̻̝̮̖̯̽ͥ̀͆͊ͣ̓ṁ̥̗̽i̡̳̼̝̤͖͉͊ͪ̒ͤ̋s͓͎̩͂s̥̟̹͛̎͗i͙͋̔͗͋͑̓ͭl̮̬̭ͭ͛͗ȅ̩͚̹͍͓̪̙͛̉ͣ̓͊̓ ̑̒ͪ̌͏̰̤͈̜d̴̗̠̮̠ͭͥ̽ͣ̑e͖̤͙̜̣͋̎̽̀̑ͭ̕f̸̬̘̼̊̌e̤n͔̂ͪ͑ͧ̚s̹̠̗̖̟͜ͅe̱̲̯͕̝̰͔͐͛̾̐ ̻̯̥ͬ͟i͔̰̙̜͙ͨͨ̋͒͊̉͂s̨̘ͪ͐ͩ ̭̟̯͚̊͌ụ̭ͫ̄̀͗̕s̢ͥ̂̚e͚̬̫̗̥̭͂͘l̦̯̪̜̪̮͋͌̈́ͦ̎̿̈́͢e̟͖͔̟̗̼͚ͪ̋̓̈́ͦ͑s̢̝͗s̓̒̅̽ͦͧ҉͎̱͍̙̲̭

̭̪̗̝͉Ṱ̡̺̜͍̰̦̈́̃͆h̜͒ͥ̔̈́̕e̲͈̹̯r̙̩͎̪̩͗e̝̞͎̞̦̎͂̒̿͒̔̾ ̰̲͕̟̻̩͔͋̆̋̈̑̈́̃i͔͍̰̟̣͍̓ͦ̿ͬ͌̾̔s̄͠ ̖o̰͖̬̅̿̽̽͑͂n̬̭͍̘̮̋͆͆͊ͮ͊ͧ͡ͅl̫̥̙̠̣̀ͤ͐͗̈ͩy̾͊͏̝͍͙ ̣͌͛̎̊Z̶̦͙̞̗͐̓Ȃ̷̘̦̈́̇͌̿̑̈́ͅL̵̞̖̬̑G͈̺̣̫͔͗̄ͧ͗̿̔̚O̗̬͈̺̱̍̃̄ͪ̍̾ͫ

̰͚̰͕Z̧͔̉̂́̈ͥÅ̭̦͇̯͑ͥ͞L̳͙̗ͫͧ͐ͧǴ̢̹̖̙̍ͬÓ̧̉ͫ̃ ̴̲̮̥̜͉̻̩̈́̽ͨ͐̌ͦw̹̋ͩ̒ͣ͛i̇̍́̎l͙̬̻̬͈ͧ̆̆̂̔̊l̹̑͗̓ͮ̐̽͐ ̹͙͍̰̽͐̈̐̃̇̚e̝̩͕̹̫͚͐͟x̲͕̭̪̀͌̃̎̾p̣̫̟̝̘̰̅̈ͅuͫ̐̒ͫ͜n̲̪ͩͨͮ̇͑g̷͍̪̹̥̜ͯ͐e̖͉͓̰̹ͦ̃ ̷̞͚̞̪̼͕̓̇̐̈̔̉ḧ̩́̌̐̇ͮu҉͇̺͔͚̮m̛͖̙͍̮̝̼̹ͩ̓͆̒ͣḁ̫͎͖̃͟ṅ̯͙͚̥̍͌̅i̬͍̦̳̣͊͗ͧţ̮̹̜̙̈́̃y̮̟̌ͭ́̅͒̈̀̚ ̜̍͂̎̂̒ͮ̀̚f̙̝͕̅̒ͫ͊͛̆r͈͓̦̘̻̅ͭ̕o͕̞̱̪ͩͣͤͯ͋́m͔͔̟̞͇͎̤ͦͫͥͧ̅ͪ ̟͈̮̘̠̓ͬ͒́ͦ̓͐̕t̸͔͖̻̩͑̋̈ͤ̋̆h̷̥̞̞̳̭̰i͚̯̺̣̠̓̇̆ͤͨ̑̃s̵͇̰̘͚̳̰̻̄ͦ ̶̻̼̑̓p̌̇̿l̯̘̙̣̪̪̼̒a̷̻̳̳̣̯̗̩ͣͨ͊̏n̨̏̓͆e̱͓͙̖̯̐ͤ̑̑̍̚ͅ

̟̜̺͙̬̜̖̉ͫ̑̌͝Y͖̩̙͓̾͜ǒ̶̰̬̜̳̐̓̄̎̂u̧͈̥͌ ̪̬̪̬̻͙̝c̳̹̈́ͥͯ̔͌͌a̛ͨn̪̯̗̹̖̒͌ͩ̾́n̢̞̲͚ͬͅo̷̩̳͉͌̂̂ͅt͙͗̋ ̘ͤ̽ͫ́d̷̃̂e͍̭͈̔͒ͯsͣ͊ͫ̅͗҉̘̥͙͇̱͍tͭͦͬ̂͡r̜̲͓̰̙ͯ̓͆̋ö̯͔́̃̈́̃͑̊̄y̟̭̗̣̥̺ͬ̀̀ ̶̟̼̟͓̫͔͗͒͛̅̋Z̻̦̼̹̤̐ͦ̋Ä̴̯̙̺̝͚̠̏ͬͨ̄̓L̖̻͖̙̋ͨG̵͎̥̲̾̆̔ͯͨͨO͐̀͌ͬ̈́͑̓

ͥ͆̍̑͛͂Y̔̓ͧ̓̿ǫͮ̾̂u̪͒̈̓̃ͤ̏ ̨̥͎̜ͬ̊̒̚c̶̻̪͚̊̓̌͐͗ͦͧa̭̜̹̳̓̎̽̌͑n̗̫̥̹ͮǹ̹͖̥̖̚o͕̗̳̎ͯͭ͢tͩ̐̂̏͢ ̥͓͍̠͇̺̖ͪ̓͌́ͣ̉ͦ͡h͖̤̻͍ͅi̝̹͇̞͊̉̒ḏ̢̥͖͓̱͕̽èͭ̃̍ͮ̀ ̵̬̗͖̝͓̈̃ͬ̎̃͐̔ͅf̼̥̺̋̓̿ͫͭ͒̓ȓ̢͎̰͕͕̬̆ͪͣ̇oͮ͌̀͂̍͠m̞̂̄̒̒͋ ̣̗̳͌͂ͬ̽͑Z̡̘̻̼͔̓͊͌Ḁ̪̼͓͙͂̂̿̊͛̋L̳͎̯̘̼̬̥̓̉̎ͫG̃̈͗̄̆O͍̻͚͈̾ͦ̿̚͞

̼̈̕Z̙̼͇̘ͮAͪ͋̓ͬ̓L̶̩̪̭G̞͖͇̝̗͚ͬ̃͐ͯ͋̚Ỏ͊̄ͦ̿͆

̕Z̥͓̀A̗̤̗͊͆ͪͭͥͨ̆́Ḷ͓̫̺ͦ̔ͥ̓̎͛G̯̘̬͔͎̪̳̍̍́̏̔̔̐O̠͉

̣̬͈̒̐

̭̥̜̍ͨ͗͒ͭ̄Z̷̝͖̠̫̜̘̙̀̈́͐̓̃A̡L̺͓̭̹̭͍͒̀G͚̟͚̙̠̔ͮÕ̭͚͇͓͖

̨̎͑͂

͊͛̿͠H͚͇E̶͇͔̰̲̮ ̜̫̝̮̻͕̦ͩ̓͌͂͝C̵̹̰͙̳̘̏́ͫO͖Ṁ̦͔͎̀̀̚E͇̼͈͑̓ͨͩ̆ͥS̺̃̍͌ͥ̈́͂

 

HE COMES

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dustin/DML,

 

I tend to agree with you....but when were K debates anything other than stand against or refuse and not actual advocacy.

 

Personally I think K affs should have to defend action--you say a plan text--you should actually mean it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dustin/DML,

 

I tend to agree with you....but when were K debates anything other than stand against or refuse and not actual advocacy.

 

Personally I think K affs should have to defend action--you say a plan text--you should actually mean it.

 

1.not all k's are just reject or refuse, for example the k's i run

 

2.what's to say that discourse isn't an action?

but i don't use a plan text and i don't really know how much i like plan text k affs either for that same reason you listed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Personally I think K affs should have to defend action--you say a plan text--you should actually mean it.

 

From my experience, its more strategic for a K aff to go all out and not read a plan text or endorse one unless in terms of some greater discourse. Defending a plan with kritikal advantages only gives the negative ground to weigh their own Ks v the aff and only limits aff responses against them.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...