Jump to content
HoldenMcGroin

Spec Ops Neg. (Afgan)

Recommended Posts

Well, i would say your typical afghan da's. Here are some good ideas

 

General withdraw link- says that special ops are really well trained and really good soldiers.

 

http://www.strategypage.com/dls/articles/Unleashing-Special-Forces-In-Afghanistan--6-28-2009.asp

 

CMR- Military loves special ops, taking them aways destroys cmr.

 

http://washingtonindependent.com/67136/special-operations-chiefs-quietly-sway-afghanistan-policy

 

They might have an ilaw advantage, just run ilaw neg.

 

You could run a courts counterplan, cause special ops are in more than just afghanistan, so rule them unconstitutional.

 

It would help if I knew more of a case outline, but thats the best i can do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
that would get permed so easily though.

Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll. Please be a troll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

haha. I was thinking of the aff a team runs on my circuit that says "remove everything BUT special ops from Afghanistan."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
haha. I was thinking of the aff a team runs on my circuit that says "remove everything BUT special ops from Afghanistan."

Ask them in cross x what is included as special ops. Than read the Task Force 173 removal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ask them in cross x what is included as special ops. Than read the Task Force 173 removal

 

He has one of two intentions here. Either he mistyped and means TF 373:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Task_Force_373

 

Or he is a Trekkie and is referring to:

 

http://stexpanded.wikia.com/wiki/Task_Force_173

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...