Jump to content
ZzZzZzZzZzZz

DAs and CP

Recommended Posts

Is it a legitimate and/or fair neg strategy to run a CP and also run a DA which links to both the CP and the affirmative plan and then argue that if the CP is dropped, the judge should consider the DA?

In other words, the neg runs a CP and DA. The DA links to the CP and aff plan. The neg eventually drops the CP and goes for the DA in the 2nr.

Is this fair?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally, it's not a good idea to do this since there are most likely plenty of other DAs you can run that don't contradict with the CP, fiving you a lot more leeway in the debate. You also have to remember that in terms of CP strategy, you always need a net-benefit to the CP. (this means you need something, like a Disad, that makes the CP a better option then the plan)

 

In terms of fairness, or "theory" as it's commonly called, it's not "unfair" to run a DA and a CP that contradict (albeit a bit dumb) but there is a question of fairness in "dropping" CPs. This, if you don't know, is a question of the "status" of the CP.

If you would like more information on that see these threads:

http://www.cross-x.com/vb/showthread.php?t=992033&highlight=Conditionality

http://www.cross-x.com/vb/showthread.php?t=988441&highlight=Conditionality

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...