TheHutt 1472 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 I jest, but inside, I die a little inside because I know I'm far more likely to be dropped for running a counterplan at our circuit than I am in Idaho. Lies, you won't be dropped for running a counterplan, you'll be dropped because the judge has no fucking clue what a counterplan is. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
highlandmike 73 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 Lies, you won't be dropped for running a counterplan, you'll be dropped because the judge has no fucking clue what a counterplan is. your mod duties have begun to give you insight to our state. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bonavex 64 Report post Posted May 27, 2009 your mod duties have begun to give you insight to our state. I think he was talking about his (former) and my (current) circuit, and he's right. Perhaps, though, Idaho and Northeastern California have more in common than I had previously thought. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chaz 12 Report post Posted May 29, 2009 Lies, you won't be dropped for running a counterplan, you'll be dropped because the judge has no fucking clue what a counterplan is. actually... http://www.idhsaa.org/speecharts/SpeechArtsRegs.doc 6. In a counter plan case, or where a specific minor repair is advanced by the negative, the negative must present the proposal during the first negative constructive speech. The negative must not implement the resolution advanced by the affirmative. "must not implement the resolution advanced by the affirmative" could just mean no PICS, which is terrible enough, but it's being enforced as no topical counterplans. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheHutt 1472 Report post Posted May 29, 2009 actually... http://www.idhsaa.org/speecharts/SpeechArtsRegs.doc 6. In a counter plan case, or where a specific minor repair is advanced by the negative, the negative must present the proposal during the first negative constructive speech. The negative must not implement the resolution advanced by the affirmative. "must not implement the resolution advanced by the affirmative" could just mean no PICS, which is terrible enough, but it's being enforced as no topical counterplans. Good try, but I'm referring to my area and not yours. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
highlandmike 73 Report post Posted May 30, 2009 perhaps the two are alternate versions of each other, in parallel universes... o.O Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
