Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
annoying khs debater

Bikes

Recommended Posts

She would claim its abuse to record her
Its not abusive if you actually read the warrants of your fucking cards and dont cheat also before the round be like i am going to record you and if you want you can record my speeches too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this thread should be renamed "let's hate on candace and kate"... jesus.

 

for the record: kate is a sweetheart out of round.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its not abusive if you actually read the warrants of your fucking cards and dont cheat also before the round be like i am going to record you and if you want you can record my speeches too.

dude, the judge may not like that.

 

im not saying to not call them on it in th 1nc if you really, really, really, really want to, but after that it should disappear. (unless they drop it. then go for it.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

their aff is pretty easy to make a good strategy against. it's when they're neg that they're most abusive.

 

like, asking them literally "Candice, I do not understand your argument. Please clarify for me so I can debate about it." and her response is "You shouldn't need clarification for normal means spec, it's run all the time. I won't answer that question - btw, that is an independent voter for fairness - he wanted clarification which is abusive."

 

I think the best thing to do would to cut a K to saying "Abuse" a lot. like, it normalizes us to real violence and abuse.

 

Like, they don't even make arguments...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wah? I dunno... i run cap bad a lot, and cut a link to the aff.

 

they kind of are ridiculous though:

 

1) stealing my evidence isn't nice (it's not cheating though)

2) not answering questions in cx

3) running arguments that aren't what they say

4) clipping

5) yelling

6) being mean as a tactic

7) starting to make arguments in the 2nr and still not explaining them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know how their plan uses the USFG or does it not even use it?

Could you cut a k from these articles saying that the aff comes in the round with the pre assmption that everyone views bicycles as safe and eco friendly and then just right a k of off this?

Edited by Dr. Claw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yous should also say the plan offends people who have a fear of bikes otherwise known as Bike-a-phobia and say that dehuminizes bike-a-phobics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yous should also say the plan offends people who have a fear of bikes otherwise known as Bike-a-phobia and say that dehuminizes bike-a-phobics

Ok so couldnt this be a k to their k aff

 

Link-the plan offends people with bike-a-phobia

Impact-dehuminization

Alt-dont do plan?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rejection of the aff is the only way to embrace a non dehumanic society.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...