Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Warezxxx

CFL- Arguments

Recommended Posts

I am not sure if this is the right forum for this but.

My partner and I qualified for CFL this year. We have only been to Glen brooks and Emory but we were wondering what kind of arguments people would run.

We had been told that CFL is more traditional (i.e. no Kritiks) by some but others that it was Similar to Glenbrooks/ Emory.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest fizelly27
I am not sure if this is the right forum for this but.

My partner and I qualified for CFL this year. We have only been to Glen brooks and Emory but we were wondering what kind of arguments people would run.

We had been told that CFL is more traditional (i.e. no Kritiks) by some but others that it was Similar to Glenbrooks/ Emory.

it depennds on your panel

first round i had a panel that told me no off case positionnn, no speed, annd nnoo apocalypse scenarios

rouund 5 i had 3 ttabula rasa judges

 

prep for botth styles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its not a terribly hostile atmosphere if you are prepared to debate more than one strategy. but i would urge caution that it *is* somewhat more conservative as a whole. i would definitely recommend preparing more on the case debate side of things than the critique side. maybe like a 60/40 split.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...