Warezxxx 15 Report post Posted April 22, 2008 I am not sure if this is the right forum for this but. My partner and I qualified for CFL this year. We have only been to Glen brooks and Emory but we were wondering what kind of arguments people would run. We had been told that CFL is more traditional (i.e. no Kritiks) by some but others that it was Similar to Glenbrooks/ Emory. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest fizelly27 Report post Posted April 22, 2008 I am not sure if this is the right forum for this but. My partner and I qualified for CFL this year. We have only been to Glen brooks and Emory but we were wondering what kind of arguments people would run. We had been told that CFL is more traditional (i.e. no Kritiks) by some but others that it was Similar to Glenbrooks/ Emory. it depennds on your panel first round i had a panel that told me no off case positionnn, no speed, annd nnoo apocalypse scenarios rouund 5 i had 3 ttabula rasa judges prep for botth styles Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Warezxxx 15 Report post Posted April 22, 2008 Thanks, that sounds like a interesting atmosphere to have debates. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ankur 2917 Report post Posted April 22, 2008 its not a terribly hostile atmosphere if you are prepared to debate more than one strategy. but i would urge caution that it *is* somewhat more conservative as a whole. i would definitely recommend preparing more on the case debate side of things than the critique side. maybe like a 60/40 split. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andromeda 137 Report post Posted April 22, 2008 Case debate strengthens your off-case positions, anyhow... 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Neurotic_Mastermind 1650 Report post Posted April 24, 2008 This probably belongs in National Circuit. Moved. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
