Jump to content
nsanluis

UIL State 2008

Recommended Posts

4A BREAKS!!

 

Bay City GP

Bay City GR

Burnet JW

Calhoun LL (woot)

Corsicana HP

Crosby JM

Crosby SS

Crowley HR

Elgin HK

Flour Bluff DR

Friendswood CS

Hallsville CG

Highland Park BD

Lampasas BC

McKinney Boyd BG

Mercedes CF

 

 

top speakers

1. Corsicana (didnt get name sorry)

2. Calhoun- Lu

3. Bay City- Celeste Grebe

4. Calhoun- Johnny Lee

5. Burnet- Jeff Wedkin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

aww congrats to leanna, chrystal, matt and lauren <333 i love all of you guys

 

 

but does anyone have 5A breaks yet?

 

i heard deer park broke first and third seed but my sources may be wrong.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aww congrats to leanna, chrystal, matt and lauren <333 i love all of you guys

 

tootired but luke mc d got top speaker

 

 

but does anyone have 5A breaks yet?

 

i heard deer park broke first and third seed but my sources may be wrong.

hard to tell. They dont give you ranks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4A BREAKS!!

 

Bay City GP

Bay City GR

Burnet JW (4-0)

Calhoun LL (4-0)

Corsicana HP

Crosby JM

Crosby SS

Crowley HR

Elgin HK

Flour Bluff DR (3-1)

Friendswood CS

Hallsville CG (3-1)

Highland Park BD

Lampasas BC (3-1)

McKinney Boyd BG

Mercedes CF (4-0)

 

 

top speakers

1. Corsicana (didnt get name sorry)

2. Calhoun- Lu

3. Bay City- Celeste Grebe

4. Calhoun- Johnny Lee

5. Burnet- Jeff Wedkin

 

The Coriscana guy who got top speaker is Randall Holloman (sp?).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A&M Consol vs Katy Taylor (Aff)

Austin BR Aff vs Grapevine DF

Bellaire UL vs Plano KZ

Hightower CS vs Bellaire FS

Memorial LO vs Jersey Village BE

Jersey Villiage LM vs Deer Park BC

Westwood MX vs Clearlake MZ

Westwood PS vs Plano CT

 

Rounds going on now

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Austin BR vs Westwood PS

 

Bellaire vs Deer Park (forfeits due to prompting)

 

Memorial LO vs Westwood MX

 

Katy Taylor vs Bellaire FS

 

Good Luck to ALL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Austin BR vs Westwood PS

 

Bellaire vs Deer Park (forfeits due to prompting)

 

Memorial LO vs Westwood MX

 

Katy Taylor vs Bellaire FS

 

Good Luck to ALL

 

congrats on quarters to everyone, especially jenny, shubba, matt, and jacob.

 

whats the deal with the forfeit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5A Semis

Bellaire v. Katy Taylor

Austin v. Westwood

 

4A Semis

Friendswood v. Crosby

Bay City v. Mercedes

 

 

congratz to all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

\\ Kevin and I dropped in ocs, but here's what I know.

 

5A Quarters

 

Westwood MX v. SomeSchool XX

Westwood BT v. SomeSchool XX

Bellaire FS v. Katy Taylor AM

Bellaire LU def. Deer Park B_ (DQ??)

 

one of the blanks is Houston Memorial XX

 

 

/// edit ///

 

p.s. I don't like you either, anonymous neg-rep(er)

Edited by NoSxp
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5A Quarters

 

Westwood MX v. Some School XX

Westwood PS v. Austin BR

Bellaire FS v. Katy Taylor AM

Bellaire LU advances without debating

 

Semis

 

Westwood MX v. Austin BR(aff)

Bellaire LU def. Katy Taylor XX

 

Finals

 

Westwood MX v. Bellaire LU(Invading Darfur)

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as the dp2 was giving his 2AC he finished the case flow, then right after finishing the T flow he said ''And now onto the T flow''.

he then realized his mistake and said ''scratch that on to the cp flow''

as he was saying the second part his partner said ''no''

the round went on just like usual with no interruptions or calling the round off to prompting. then when the round ended one of the judges confronted with multiple of the observers and one of the other judges. apparently after the round was decided, a 2-1 in favor of the affirmative deer park, an observer informed uil directors and the deer park team was not allowed to debate the quarterfinals round due to ''prompting''

  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

has finals happened/been posted yet? im curious...

 

GO DANNN!!! I LOVE YOU

 

good octs round btw sir

 

edit: those two posts above were posted as i was typing...my bad

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
as the dp2 was giving his 2AC he finished the case flow, then right after finishing the T flow he said ''And now onto the T flow''.

he then realized his mistake and said ''scratch that on to the cp flow''

as he was saying the second part his partner said ''no''

the round went on just like usual with no interruptions or calling the round off to prompting. then when the round ended one of the judges confronted with multiple of the observers and one of the other judges. apparently after the round was decided, a 2-1 in favor of the affirmative deer park, an observer informed uil directors and the deer park team was not allowed to debate the quarterfinals round due to ''prompting''

Yeah, I heard about that. I didn't know the full story, but it sounds pretty illegit.

 

That's the way the cookie crumbles I suppose. :rolleyes:

 

In any case, congratulations to all participants. :)

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
as the dp2 was giving his 2AC he finished the case flow, then right after finishing the T flow he said ''And now onto the T flow''.

he then realized his mistake and said ''scratch that on to the cp flow''

as he was saying the second part his partner said ''no''

the round went on just like usual with no interruptions or calling the round off to prompting. then when the round ended one of the judges confronted with multiple of the observers and one of the other judges. apparently after the round was decided, a 2-1 in favor of the affirmative deer park, an observer informed uil directors and the deer park team was not allowed to debate the quarterfinals round due to ''prompting''

yeah that does suck pretty bad. but its UIL and everyone knows that its similar to playing russian roulette. either way congrats to catlin and tyler <3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is As close as i could get to typing up the arguments made in the Finals Round.

 

Affirmative is Bellaire (people who want to send US into Darfur)

And Westwood (Murray and Jeffery)

 

They start off with a quote from a survivor of the Rwandan Genocide about the UN leavng them.

Person in Rwandan Genocide

 

Genocide is a big publc health concern

Encyclopedia of Public health XX

 

Plan Text: The executive should deploy military based in djabouti to Darfur (close but not exact)

 

 

Contention Two: Western Drive for Genocide

 

There are no more refugee camps, just death camps.

Batista in 2005

 

Claiming lives of over 200K civilians

Pol readings(?) XX

 

Raping and killing vllagers

 

Curent policies rooted in racit that sees them as less than human

Abakwa XX

Refusal to intervene leads to genocide in other regions

X 2006

 

Slaughter with impunity especially if protected by the Chinese

 

Genocide will lead to other bad shit like war

x 2003

 

Warrant: Hitlers genocide =ww2 Bosnia=Haven for islamic

Us policy makers make it a garden state for genocide.

Total 96

 

This one doesnt relly talk about africa, just more bosnia cards about ethnic cleansing. Something about the "anti-geopolitical

 

Observation 3: Never again

 

The US military is uniquely suited.

Brookner 04

 

Unique supplies, technical supplies, Other nations will join in, cultural insensitivity

 

Lack of intelligence in the status quo/soldiers are good at killing people (?)

CNN TV (?)

 

Operation enduring freedom made soldiers able to kill less experienced soldiers.

 

Intervention sets a precedent

Abakwa 2005

 

This card actually talks about why the UN should intervene

 

National security concerns are irrelevant, must put others first.

Douger 96

 

Religious cults and shit can kill people, hell on earth, US policy should be guided by interest abroad.

 

Cross-examination of the 1ac

Why vote affirmative?

 

Its ethical for some reasons

-Us policy

-symptomatic of US policy

 

 

Why is ethics a good idea?

Only under our ethical framework can you achieve peace in the international system.

 

Who determines what is the "right thing" to do?

My personal opinion is saving Darfur genocide would be good

 

If we win there's more deaths post plan, do we win?

No, people in darfur are more important that everyone else

 

How is this public health assistance?

Encyclopedia of public health says its just public health

 

Why is military action Key?

Reves ev says humanitarian aid is bad because rebel groups can divert it.

 

Why aren't we there now?

The US supports the rebels against the governments.

 

Is the Sudanese government good as per the 1AC?

No.

 

Then why stabilize them?

Current policy prevents aid from getting to refugee camps.

 

 

 

1NC

 

PHA=disease prevention

 

India Deal Good Disad (Global Warming)

Bipart Link

 

Case--

 

Alt causality for US Security Paradigm

Turn on genocide--HR=intervention

 

 

Infinite obligation to the other bad

 

2ac

 

Topicality

W/m--plan mandates public health assistance. This Means we're not FX

 

W/m D is ph emergency--

CDC

 

c/i promot public health

 

Only our interp deals with fundemental structures

Cite missing

 

Don't vot eon pot abuse

 

Reasonability

 

Theirs plus ours

 

9. FX is justified

Encyclopedia of PH has direct link

 

India Deal

n/u-- just increased aid

 

N/l-Congress won't

 

turn wpn 05 public support

 

public standing key to agenda

 

Turn-Democrats

 

a. Sudan key to democrats

 

b. Democrats key to agenda

Salt lake review 07

 

 

 

 

Case

 

Perceptions--

 

Abawka says we set a precedent now, this means we solve for the erosion of international human rights credibility. Selective enforcement like the disadvantage and kritik erodes human rights credibility.

 

Zizek/himan rights

 

1. We're colonialist now in darfur, we solve that

 

2. Turn--we embrace something that rejects national security argiments

 

3. Turn--refusal to intervene=complicit with genocide

 

A2: You cause more wars--

4. This is false, all other examples are just aid, not military

 

5.Booker 04 says other countries would join in--especially AU-- this checks back alterior motives.

 

6. we increase the AU role in Africa. This solves back.

 

7. International coalitions would be better.

 

8. Criticizing humanitarianism because of imperialism ignores opressed peoples.

 

9. We win that we cause a mindset shift--Douger 96 says other countries would follow the US's lead in this human rights credibility stuff

 

10. Reading biographical narrative of US policy is a self narrative that breaks down something or the other.

 

steel 06

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Semis

Crosby d. Friendswood

Bay City d. Mercedes

 

Finals

Bay City d. Crosby

 

do you know which crosby that is?

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven Murray and Jeffrey Xu are now your 2008 UIL 5A state champions.

 

Much respect to Dan and Eli, who put up the best fight against my T onslaught as they ever have. It was an incredibly fun round. As per an agreement, they now have to win the TOC.

  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
do you know which crosby that is?

 

im pretty sure jennings malek

 

billy mcdowell first speakaa!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...