Jump to content
SP 101

Wat would you run aganist this case

Recommended Posts

Gender violence

Thus we demand: The United States Federal Government provide substantial funding for public health assistance based intervention in resolutionally designated countries designed to end gender violence.

 

It solves for patriarchy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest svfrey

T- violence not PHA

international actor CP- like seriously, there's zero "US key" warrant for gender violence.

spending,

politics

any variation of your china DA's, if they're still unique, lol.

impact turn patriarchy if you feel like it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CApatialism why. also what pha T

 

For cap it would be the general ID Ptix/Multiculturalism links plus some generic aid stuff. There are also good cards about how the plan misses the point - the root cause of this violence is capitalism. This combined with the external impacts of cap and the solvency turns seems like an interesting debate.

 

pha would probably be

 

MEIER '6 (Benjamin Mason Meier, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia U; Program Manager of Center for Health Policy, Cornell International Law Journal, “Global Justice: Poverty, Human Rights, and Responsibilities: Employing Health Rights for Global Justice: The Promise of Public Health in Response to the Insalubrious Ramifications of Globalization International Development and Globalization Fellow,” Fall, 2006)

 

[*741] Beginning at the end of the nineteenth century under a "microbial model" of public health, governments focused on the spread of diseases, both communicable and noncommunicable, seeking to prevent the spread of pathogens responsible for illness. Applying the "germ theory" of public health to associate a disease with a specific microbial infection, public health responses during this period targeted the pathogen - looking to the environmental conditions ( e.g., water, air), food source, vector (e.g., mosquitoes), or human host responsible for disease transmission - and sought either to limit its transmission (e.g., isolation or inoculation) or prevent the conditions in which it flourished ( e.g., meat inspection). To accomplish these goals, epidemiologists engaged in aggressive forms of surveillance and contact tracing, sometimes engendering public opposition, to monitor and study the progression of the incidence (new cases) and prevalence (existing cases) of disease. In responding to these diseases, national and international public health programs addressed communicable diseases through hygiene and sanitation programs, vector eradication, and vaccination; for noncommunicable disease, these programs focused on sanitary engineering and the provision of safe water, milk, and food.

 

edit: thanks mbv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think "Public health includes communicable and non-communicable diseases." is part of the actual card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gender violence

Thus we demand: The United States Federal Government provide substantial funding for public health assistance based intervention in resolutionally designated countries designed to end gender violence.

 

It solves for patriarchy

 

Patriarchy Good---key to heg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot seriously believe so many people suggest patriarchy good- that shit is fucked up, any decent team with a patriarchy advantage should be able to beat the shit out of that argument (hell I know judges that would drop a team in a second for even running that argument if the aff said anything about it).

not that this isn't just as predictable as patriarchy, at least it isn't as morally reprehensible- Queer Theory/Butler with an aff inclusive alt, cuz it wouldnt take to much aff shifting to get you out of that hole.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if they have a patriarchy advantage and they don't read discourse matters in the round they deserve to lose to patriarchy key to heg.

 

(isn't this easily turnable- there must be answers in those womyn in combat backfiles y'all must have?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some people have already mentioned these but:

 

They only fund, you should win some case alt causes and a corruption disad that the money just re entrenches the problem

 

Spanos arg on this is extremely compeling -- kicking the vietnam syndrome is the link in this case, that all of a sudden we can solve for patriarchy

 

international cp, as someone said, no US key warrant

 

That way, there are 3 solid options for the 2NR, but the case args should be like 3 min long and make the 2ac think a little more than just pulling out a block. Hope it helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
if they have a patriarchy advantage and they don't read discourse matters in the round they deserve to lose to patriarchy key to heg.

 

(isn't this easily turnable- there must be answers in those womyn in combat backfiles y'all must have?)

It wouldn't matter whether they read discourse matters or not if the advantage is turned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i found a plan flaw never specifies where the funding is going just says give funding everything will happen on its own. B never specifies what is going to be done with the funding once it gets there plan just says gender violence end i havent seen the aff so i might be wrong but yeah i think these are two flaws.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

T - Effects

T - Aspec

 

Cultural imperialism K

 

Pakistan Politx

Iran DA (islam link)

 

 

And disaster porn is a stupid K... especially the Baudrillard cards... I seriously think that Baurdrillard should only be used for reality/hyperreality. Look into some Spanos if your going to run humanism/disaster porn. But really imperialism is a lot more "Real World" and links easier

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...