Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Posts

Ask in cross-x how you could possibly avoid it, what should the plan text say.


If they say "topically mandated regions" that is vague and destroys negative ground

If they say you should list the countries that hides planks and exclusions (eg. they don't say zimbabwe, the 1NC doesn't realize, new in the 2NC is potentially illegitimate).


Regardless -- any topical advocacy would require keeping the colonial barrier between Northern and sub-Saharan Africa. That imaginary line that in the colonial line between brown and black Africa is what is "racist" -- it isn't the term.


You can perm the hell out of it too... perm: we apologize for using racist discourse to properly affirm the resolution, we'll try our best never to be aff again. You can also perm different instances, like tank our speaker points for using bad language. Plus, critiquing the resolution is sort of unfair because it theoretically allows the neg to win every round.


You can also spike out of the position by saying like "to the African continent excluding XYZ" or "topically mandated regions", etc.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...