Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
TheScuSpeaks

ethics proceed ontology and ontology bad

Recommended Posts

You can look at Levinas for ontology bad. There is also this Campbell evidence that says ontology justifices the holocaust and Nazi stuff like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look for a book by Adriaan Peperzak, i think its something along the lines of For the Other, the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas... its a lot more straitforward than Levinas himself, and better for debate purposes... I have cut some of the cards that you are looking for from it... "Is Ontology Fundamental" does not make good debate evidence...

 

-G.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Post #13 here:http://www.cross-x.com/vb/showthread.php?t=968033&highlight=Campbell has some Campbell evidence. THe book that most of his good cards come from is called "The Deterrortilization of Responsibility."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can look at Levinas for ontology bad. There is also this Campbell evidence that says ontology justifices the holocaust and Nazi stuff like that.

 

Cambell and Levinas are no different in this context. the campbell cards you are refering to are just campbell talking about Levinas' philosiphy. He uses the word Levinas every other sentence, the cards that were posted by campbell are great examples of this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...