Jump to content
Whats a file?

Spokane Thread

Recommended Posts

The Panopticon is just one way normalization is brought about. Normalization via schooling etc. is separate.

 

Some argue that biopolitics is good because its intention is to promote the overall health of the population (Ojakangas). Some argue it's key to heg. Some would go as far as saying that the panopticon etc is good because it keeps the population in check. There's a lot of things. It's all a matter of perspective.

 

So if I ran a fucko K, I would need to distinguish why their way of normalization is bad?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So if I ran a fucko K, I would need to distinguish why their way of normalization is bad?

 

against the teams that aren't half brain-dead.

the rest won't have a clue who foucault is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
against the teams that aren't half brain-dead.

the rest won't have a clue who foucault is.

 

Haha, am I going to get a lot of half-brain dead teams in Spokane? So if I was going against a Foucault K, I would need to say why our form of biopolitics is good and not malicious?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Haha, am I going to get a lot of half-brain dead teams in Spokane? So if I was going against a Foucault K, I would need to say why our form of biopolitics is good and not malicious?

 

you gonna disclose then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you gonna disclose then?

 

I will tell my team to disclose when I see them at my school but I don't particularly feel like signing up at the moment nor do I know what my advantages are. I will next week at school. If you really can't wait, my partner and I, SGS GL is running SALW aff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dak give him a break, he's a novice (albeit a good one)

the real kids that need to be disclosing are their A and B teams

 

my bad, i thought he was the sgs team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So if I ran a fucko K, I would need to distinguish why their way of normalization is bad?

Elaborate as to how the plan creates docile bodies. When subjects become docile bodies the implications become inevitable because there's no resistance.

 

Here's two examples of it from my overview last year

 

FIFTH, THEY MAKE INDIVIDUALS A MEANS TO THE STATES ENDS, BY USING THEM IN SERVICE, THIS MEANS THEY WILL ALWAYS LINK.

 

SIXTH, THEY ATOMIZE INDIVIDUALS INTO GROUPS BY PLACING THEM IN NATIONAL SERVICE – WHEN THIS OCCURS INDIVIDUALS LOSE THEIR AUTONOMY AND AGENCY, THIS MEANS THE KRITIK IMPACTS BECOME INEVITABLE, BECAUSE INDIVIDUALS CAN NOT RESIST.

 

(note you may want to elaborate more than that, I was just a cheap asshole that read like 25 of these little blips and hoped you'd drop one)

 

And for the most part, Spokane is kritiktarded. 75 % of the teams answered Foucault in the worst way possible.

The only teams that answer it decently are Rusty (most of the time, that one time when Abe was our judge as the exception), Andrew/Thomas, and Wilson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

okay joe could you somehow let sgs know that it'd be nice to get cites sometime soon. or is galen out there somewhere? i'd like cites before the weekend is over...thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
okay joe could you somehow let sgs know that it'd be nice to get cites sometime soon. or is galen out there somewhere? i'd like cites before the weekend is over...thanks

 

I don't have any of my debate stuff here outside of some files I downloaded and some stuff I was working on. Did you get a hold of Galen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Elaborate as to how the plan creates docile bodies. When subjects become docile bodies the implications become inevitable because there's no resistance.

 

Here's two examples of it from my overview last year

 

FIFTH, THEY MAKE INDIVIDUALS A MEANS TO THE STATES ENDS, BY USING THEM IN SERVICE, THIS MEANS THEY WILL ALWAYS LINK.

 

SIXTH, THEY ATOMIZE INDIVIDUALS INTO GROUPS BY PLACING THEM IN NATIONAL SERVICE – WHEN THIS OCCURS INDIVIDUALS LOSE THEIR AUTONOMY AND AGENCY, THIS MEANS THE KRITIK IMPACTS BECOME INEVITABLE, BECAUSE INDIVIDUALS CAN NOT RESIST.

 

(note you may want to elaborate more than that, I was just a cheap asshole that read like 25 of these little blips and hoped you'd drop one)

 

And for the most part, Spokane is kritiktarded. 75 % of the teams answered Foucault in the worst way possible.

The only teams that answer it decently are Rusty (most of the time, that one time when Abe was our judge as the exception), Andrew/Thomas, and Wilson.

 

Alright, so what do you recommend are some good arguments to block out?

 

I have blocks against stuff like,

 

Biopolitics good: Helps stop violence

Biopower inevitable

Public Health Biopower good

No Link, Habitus, "Link assumes no one will resist."

Ambiguity

 

Any other must have argument to block out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AT: Perm Do Both

AT: Timeframe Perm

AT: Perm Do Plan

AT: Link Turn

AT: Impact Turn

AT: No Link

AT: No Alt

AT: Power Everywhere

AT: Foucault Indicts

AT: Digging at root of huge thing

AT: We decrease state power

AT: Policy Framework

AT: Realism Good

AT: Realism Inevitable

AT: Rorty

AT: Case outweighs

AT: Nihilistic

AT: No textual alt

AT: Said

AT: Pragmatism Good

AT: Relavitism

AT: Biopower inevitable

AT: Foucault doesn’t agree

AT: Postmodernism bad

AT: Using State Key

AT: Heg impact turns

AT: Walzer General

AT: Walzer Democracy

AT: Strategic Essentialism

AT: Ojakangas

AT: Murray

AT: Counter K’s

AT: Focal points of resistance

AT: We help oppressed

AT: We’re voluntary

AT: Grand Narratives good

AT: Biopower isn’t bad

AT: Cedes politics to the right

AT: Feminism

 

That's from my index

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn. I better do a lot of work. Which ones do you think are the ones that'll come up the most?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AT: Perm Do Both

AT: Perm Do Plan

AT: Link Turn

AT: Impact Turn

AT: No Link

AT: No Alt

AT: Policy Framework

AT: Realism Good

AT: Realism Inevitable

AT: Rorty

 

Those are the only ones I heard consistently, Fucko was just my A strat so I blocked it like no other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright. I'll hit those and try to get the rest. Did you ever run anything else with Foucault?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner ran a federal reserve board credibility da all the time. We just ran negation theory, which says we can run multiple worlds, because the neg's job is to prove the aff wrong.

 

So you can run a lot of other stuff, just defend it in multiple worlds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...