keek_a_leek 5 Report post Posted December 20, 2006 Hey guys, I need every one of you to list ANYTHING and EVERYTHING you would run against WIC. It will be so helpful b/c I am writing blocks right now and I need to cover everything. Here I'll start off.... 1. T- Increasing 2. T- Establish 3. Milt K 4. Pre-Emptive Strike DA 5. Cooks CP 6. XO CP 7. Ban Military CP 8. Coercion DA & K 9. Foucault 10. FEMINISM!!!!!!!!! (I NEED EVERY FEMINISM ARGUMENT THAT MAY BE MADE) 11. Milt Readiness DA 12. Recruitment DA 13. Non-Violence K 14. Consult Israel CP Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kunal 38 Report post Posted December 20, 2006 subs pic Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
keek_a_leek 5 Report post Posted December 20, 2006 What the hell is the subs pic? Also, I am going to add.... 1. Saudi Arabia Pic 2. Milt Deference DA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Little Miss Sunshine 1244 Report post Posted December 20, 2006 For the love of god, don't run establish T. It is the worst argument ever. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tennisguy1313 82 Report post Posted December 20, 2006 T-persons (I'm sorry I'm just kidding) T-in (Armed Forces means ALL armed forces) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MSTR DB8R 213 Report post Posted December 20, 2006 What the hell is the subs pic? Also, I am going to add.... 1. Saudi Arabia Pic 2. Milt Deference DA Let women serve in the military, just not on submarines, b/c they can get pregnant in subs, and than the subs will have to surface to give birth. Net benefit of readiness. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VLORD 268 Report post Posted December 20, 2006 I ran against this case and here was the spread (sorry if some were said earlier in the thread): 1. T- Increase (no proof of increase, I dropped it though) 2. Militarism K - links very heavily and turns the case if you run that militarism = patriarchy and they say militarism inevitable 3. Fiscal DA - women cost $ 4. Iran Attack Bad DA - this was the RFD, basically use a generic link 5. Solvency/Case - They can't solve for ALL patriarchy and they had no timeframes So hope this helps, oh and we won so my spread is valid;) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Little Miss Sunshine 1244 Report post Posted December 20, 2006 10. FEMINISM!!!!!!!!! (I NEED EVERY FEMINISM ARGUMENT THAT MAY BE MADE) You really wanna run feminism bad? I think it is a very weak argument EDIT: I like to run topicality, then militarism K and ban the military CP vs WiC...The ban the military CP claims all of the discrimination advantages. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
papak_06 237 Report post Posted December 24, 2006 case...pull heartstrings in the 1NR/2NR..say women are used as sex slaves to keep men happy and they should be used as a last resort..i have a shit load of cards saying that...it is great...we are 2-0 against this case Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
K-Money 12 Report post Posted December 24, 2006 Let women serve in the military, just not on submarines, b/c they can get pregnant in subs, and than the subs will have to surface to give birth. Net benefit of readiness. so, it's cool if they get pregnant on the battlefield? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TempusMoriendi 29 Report post Posted December 24, 2006 I've got about half a dozen WIC Neg files if you're interested... PM me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sublime_thought 93 Report post Posted December 24, 2006 cooks pic Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TempusMoriendi 29 Report post Posted December 24, 2006 cooks pic Court? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shayan Makani 588 Report post Posted December 24, 2006 Court? What? To my knowledge, this counterplan allows women to serve in all combat positions except that of being a military cook. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mbv 1082 Report post Posted December 25, 2006 It's seems ironic for the aff to say "let the womyn be cooks." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shayan Makani 588 Report post Posted December 25, 2006 It's seems ironic for the aff to say "let the womyn be cooks." Their argument would probably be that full integration is critical to solve their advantage. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mbv 1082 Report post Posted December 25, 2006 Wait a minute, why aren't womyn allowed to be cooks? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
farbs 9 Report post Posted December 26, 2006 For the love of god, don't run establish T. It is the worst argument ever. That must be why I'vewon on it thrice 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites