Hydrox Z 10 Report post Posted November 21, 2006 Everyone in my novice class is funding by sin tax increase, but I bet they have no cards saying that it's good, so I'd like to have another edge in my debates. Thanks. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tshuman 1763 Report post Posted November 21, 2006 Everyone in my novice class is funding by sin tax increase, but I bet they have no cards saying that it's good, so I'd like to have another edge in my debates. Thanks.I think you'd be better off arguing that specifying funding mechanisms is extra-topical, but if you do a Google search you'll find articles like this one and this one arguing against the whole "sin tax" notion... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
loofus 30 Report post Posted November 21, 2006 Specifying Funding is bad. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VP_FritzMondale 241 Report post Posted November 21, 2006 Specifying Funding is bad. i agree Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bobmurphy 9 Report post Posted November 21, 2006 I would love to just kill someone that had sin tax card goods actually, extra-T LIKE CRAZY!!! sorry, i took the liberty of writing a very nice Overspec. block for my team just in case they hit people that specified funding. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andromeda 137 Report post Posted November 22, 2006 How is specifying funding bad? It gives the neg more ground for funding pics, etc. The only thing it takes away is FSpec, which is shitty anyway. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
L33T_D3B4T0R 2 Report post Posted November 22, 2006 How is specifying funding bad? It gives the neg more ground for funding pics, etc. The only thing it takes away is FSpec, which is shitty anyway. and takes out spending d/a links, thats like the only d/a novices run every round Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
