Jump to content
charliet@ng

neg positions brain storm

Recommended Posts

i have though about a few neg positions

 

first on funding cases

 

awol disads= funding for recrutement portrays the armed forces as a cool thing = more awol soliders = hege, canidian relations, and random other impacts

 

hege= change recurtement in armed forces undermines hege

 

random corruption disads funding is transfered somewhere else case takeout basically(you may be ablse to find some external impact but probably not)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CMR maybe?

 

Yea, it's not the best, but you could spin it with a good Hege impact, or Terror, something good.

 

But for generic Strats -

 

Militarism

Biopower

Terror Talk

Foucault (Disc Power)

Spanos (Against Peace Corps, Maybe)

Consult CPs

Heideigger (sp?)

Rights

Deontology (Util Bad)

Racism

Torture

Soft Power Good / Hard Power Bad

Politics

Statism

A-Spec

Critical Race Theory

Relations DAs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On funding cases you could write a cp that uses the money that the aff team is using. Then have the money go to a diff. orginization that you could prove is more effective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On funding cases you could write a cp that uses the money that the aff team is using. Then have the money go to a diff. orginization that you could prove is more effective.

 

Perm?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On funding cases you could write a cp that uses the money that the aff team is using. Then have the money go to a diff. orginization that you could prove is more effective.

 

But then you don't solve for the affirmative harms, so you still lose.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On funding cases you could write a cp that uses the money that the aff team is using. Then have the money go to a diff. orginization that you could prove is more effective.

 

Isnt this plan plan?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CMR relations is definetly gong to be huge agianst plans such as the draft, however i think there would be a good argument agianst it bc the draft in the 70s and there was no massive impacts bc of terrible CMR. i dunno, i still think someone could spin a good scenario with cmr...collapse of heg...increased terrorism... etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Isnt this plan plan?

 

Depends if you send it to an organization that's not in the res but still does community service. If so, then it's just a sweet non-topical CP that solves their case. If not, then yeah.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On funding cases you could write a cp that uses the money that the aff team is using. Then have the money go to a diff. orginization that you could prove is more effective.

this counterplan is the definition of artifical competition.

perm: do plan and the c/p but don't use the funding of the plan to fund the c/p.

yes, that perm is technically intrinsic, but that's a justified intrinsic permutation. That c/p justifies c/p: use plan funding to feed starving children in africa.

 

and of course the A strat for next year is AGAMBEN. GO WHATEVER BEING GO!:-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
draft leads to people moving to canada to avoid draft, destroying us canada relations, or something like that

 

as previously mentioned awol disad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hippies DA

 

u) no draft...no hippies

l) last time we had a draft...we got hippies

i/l) hippies do lots of drugs...

mpx) drugs bad

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On funding cases you could write a cp that uses the money that the aff team is using. Then have the money go to a diff. orginization that you could prove is more effective.

 

artificially competitive up the ass

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...