Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
-niperwolf

Trading for Good AFF

Recommended Posts

I'm lacking a good aff going into my next tournament. I'll be trading for some good ones. AFFs I'm interested in are

 

------------------------------------------------

Observation 1: Inherency

 

The DOD currently conducts secret intelligence missions inside Iraq

Seymour Hersh, staff writer for the New Yorker, 1-31-05, The New Yorker [“What the Pentagon can now do in secret,” Kyle]

 

Plan: Thus the plan: THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS SHOULD DECREASE THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSES’S AUTHORITY TO SEARCH WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE BY ELIMINATING HUMAN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE OPERATIONS IN IRAN.

 

Observation 2: Iran strike

 

1.) The war with Iran will come by the end of the Bush administration-Rumsfeld has already decided that an attack on Iran is necessary to promote American democracy in the Middle East and enlarged the operations of the Pentagon at the expense of the CIA.

 

Seymour Hersh, staff writer for the New Yorker, 1-31-05, The New Yorker [“What the Pentagon can now do in secret,” Kyle]

 

2.) Rumsfeld’s Intelligence operations will produce miscalculations by Iranian Government-Even the Military is worried about it

 

Barbara Starr, spokeswoman for the Pentagon, 2-15-05 [http://Http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/document?_m=d6c40d9dfdd0437229e5c139e86649ce&_docnum=1&wchp=dGLbVlb-zSkVb&md5=0376fled560433d3af25821baa9a921a]

 

3.) Iran miscalc leads to a first strike on Iran which draws in Russia and Pakistan creating a Nuclear Nightmare

 

Gaffney, 2003 (Mark; Researcher, Writer, Anti-nuclear activist) “Will Iran be next?” Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International affairs Summer Vol. 2 #2

http://www.alternativesjournal.net/volume2/number2/gaffney.pdf

 

4.) A US Strike on Iran will cause Middle East War- Iran will lash out against other Middle East Countries

 

Rachel Neuwirth, Author for Michigan News, 4-25-05

[http://www.michnews.com/artman/publish/article_7978.shtml]

 

5.) Middle East war draws in Israel and leads to Global Conflagration

 

Steinbach, 2002. [http://wagingpeace.org/articles/0203/0331steinbachisraeli.htm]

 

6.) Iran strike will accelerate Iranian Proliferation

 

Ivan Eland, Senior Fellow and director of the Center on Peace and Liberty at the Independent Institute in Oakland, January 26, 05 [CA should Iran be the next targert? www.dissidentvoice.org]

 

7.) Iran will set a precedent ensuring world proliferation

Konstantin Kosachev, Chairman of the Duma Committee on International affairs, 3/12/05, UP. P. Lexis [Mizerak]

 

8.) Proliferation leads to Extinction

 

Christopher Westdal, Canadian Ambassador for Disarmament, 3-20-2000, [http://www.dfait-naecu.gc.ca/arms/Strangelove-en.asp]

 

9.) The constant militaristic domination imposed on the Iranians by the US creates a life worse than death in which certain scenarios for extinction become scenarios for freedom

 

Mbembe, 2003 [Achille, senior researcher at the Institute of Social and Economic Research at the University of the Witwatersrand, Public Culture 15.1 p.11-40 Project Muse]

 

Observation 3: Relations

 

Plan is a concession to Iran that Changes Iran’s Perspective

Paul Taylor, “Iran election may open way for US Approch,” http://www.iranexpert.com/2004/elections25february.htm

 

Iran- US relations create peace in the Middle East

Gary Sick, Former National Security Council Staff member, 1/26/98, “Time To Talk?” http://www.pbs.org/newshour/forum/january98/iran3.html

 

1.) Increased relations lead to controlled nuclear policy, solving proliferation

Hooshang Amirahmadi, 3-2-04, “The Iranian Parliamentary Elections and US-Iran Relations” http://www.payvand.com/news/04/apr/1188.html

2.) Iran Prolif triggers a chain reaction throughout the Middle East, causing Nuclear War

Joseph Cirinione, Senior Associate and Director for Non-proliferation, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, “Proliferation Threats and Solutions,” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy v. 19, 2005, p. 341

Observation 4: Solvency

 

Even Republicans will only approve war if the US has Intel of Nuclear Weapons-The plan ensures they don’t receive Intel

 

Seymour Hersh, staff writer for the New Yorker, 1-31-05, The New Yorker [“What the Pentagon can now do in secret,” Kyle]

 

1.) Even if the CIA reports Nuclear Weapons, no one will believe them-It’s empirically proves they have no credibility with congress

LA times, 2/7/05, (“Senators Examining Quality of CIA intelligence on Iran” Greg Miller and Bob Drogin, http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/print.php?id=1334)

2.) Congressional oversight is effective at controlling intelligence agencies-Even if the executive tries to circumvent Congress can stall the operations Funding.

GPO; February 23, 1996; (US Gov’t Printing Office)

 

3.) Congressional oversight is key to prevent a vast number of Future Wars being Planned by Rumsfeld

F. William Engdahl, author of “A century of War: Anglo-American Oil politics and the New World Order. 2/12/2005, http://druckversion.studient-vonzeitfragen.net/Behind%20war%20on%20Tyranny%20I.html

---------------------------------------------------------------

 

Another I'm looking for is

 

----------------------------------------------------------------

 

OBSERVATION ONE – SQ

DOE ADMIN OF POLYGRAPH CONSTITUTE A SEARCH WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE VIA SCREENING

DELAMETER 99 HTTP://WWW.SPSE.ORG

PLUS – POLYGRAPH DOWNSIZING DOESN’T GO FAR ENOUGH – IT SHOULD ONLY BE DONE AS PART OF AN ONGIONG INVESTIGATION FOR A SPECIFIC CRIME – THIS SOLVES

ALNUQERGUE JOURNAL 03 “DOE POLYGRAPH SHIFT DOESN’T GO FAR ENOUGH”

PLAN – THE USFG SHOULD, THROUGH CONGRESS, ELIMINATE THE ADMIN OF POLYGRAPH TESTING WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. WE’LL CLARIFY.

ADVANTAGE 1 DETERRENCE

RELIANCE ON POLYGRAPHS HAD CRUSHED EMPLOYEE MORALE TO THE POINT THAT THE US IS ON THE BRINK OF NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT

AFTERGOOD 00 “POLYGRAPH TESTING AND THE DOE NATIONAL LABORATORIES”

THIS INSURES FALSE NEGATIVES, FALSE POSITIVES, AND A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY THAT ENDANGERS THE ENTIRE DOE AND THE JOB THAT THEY DO. COUNTER INTELLIGENCE EFFORTS PUT AT RISK

MOORE ’03 “THE POLYGRAPH AND LIE DETECTION”

CONFIDENCE THROUGH DOE PERSONNEL IS THE LYNCHPIN OF OUR NUCLEAR DETERRENCE – BOTH PERCIEVED AND ACTUAL

BROWNE 99 http://HTTP://WWW.ARMED –SERVICES.SENATE.GOV/STATEMNT/1999/991007JB.PDF

OUR WEAPONS ARE DETERIORATING – THREATS ARISING – SKILLED PERSONAL ARE KEY TO THEIR CREDIBILITY AND RELIABILITY – EVEN IN A WORLD OF TESTING.

JOSEPH & LEHMAN 98 HTTP://NDU.EDU/WMDCENTER/NUCPOLICY.HTML

FINALLY – NUC DETERENCE IS NOT SOMETHING WE LIKE ITS INEVITABLE AND WE MUST MANAGE IT TO PREVENT NUCLEAR WAR CHEMICAL WAR AND BIOLOGICAL WAR AND PREVENT CONFLICT ESCALATION GLOBALLY. ANY ALTERNATIVE IS A PIPEDREAM

ROBINSON 01 HTTP://WWW.MINDFULLY.ORG/NUC/NUCLEAR.WEAPONS-POLICY-21STC.HTM

POLYGRAPHS HAVE DESTROYED COUNTER – INTELLIGENCE EFFORTS FOR MULTIPLE REASONS – POSSIBLE INTERNAL DOE REFORM EXACERBATES THE PROBLEM BY SUSTAINING THE DISTRUST.

GOSS 00 (“EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: IMPROVING COUNTERINTELLIGENCE. REPORT OF THE REDMAN PANEL)

STREAMLINING THE MANAGEMENT OF THE DOE AND SOLVING BUREAUCACY PROBLEMS THROUGH TOP-DOWN CONTROL IS VITAL TO COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE- FAILURE PUTS THE US AT RISK OF A NUCLEAR ATTACK FROM TERRORISTS

VANCLEAVE 04 (WITNESS TESTIMONY : A HEARING TO REVIEW PROPOSALS TO CONSERVE THE OFFICES OF COUNTER INTELLIGENCE AT NWSA AND DOE)

THIS INTELLIGENCE IS VITAL TO RESPONDING TO AND PREVENTING NUCLEAR TERRORISM

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ISSUES 05

THE RESULTING WORLD PRETTY MUCH SUCKS

BENES 87 (LOUIS RENE. TERRORISM AND GLOBAL SECURITY: THE NUCLEAR THREAT PG 42-43)

FRAMEWORK THE JUDGE SHOULD WEIGH PLAN TO COMPETITIVE POLICY OPITON AS IF THEY WERE ENACTED BY GOVERNMENT VIA FIAT.

FAIRNESS A. INFINITE NUMBER OF RAMEWORKS ALLOWING NEGATIVE TO CHOOSE IT IS BAD

B. FIAT KEY TO FAIR DIVISION OF GROUND, ONLY WAY TO PREESTABLISH WHAT THE AFF DEFENDS

C. SAYING FIAT DOESN’T EXIST IS A NON SEQUITOR

EDUCATION A. POLICY DEBATERS BECOME POLICYMAKERS, SIMULATING GOVERNMENT IS A CHECK TO GOVERNMENT VIOLENCE

VAWLS 99 (JOHN LAW OF PEROPLES P 54-57)

B. IMAGINING IS THE EPITOME OF SWITCH SIDE DEBATING KEY TO CRITIQUEING OUR OWN ASSUMPTIONS

MUIR 93 (PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC V 26 N 4)

THIS INTERNAL LINK TURNS ALL OF THEIR ARGUMENTS BECAUSE WE JUST DEBATE THESE ISSUES NOT NECESSARILY BELIEVE THEM ALLOWING US A SAFE SPACE TO EXPLORE WITH DIFFERENT IDEAS

MUIR 93

C. FRAMEWORK IS KEY TO GOOD ACTIVISM POLICY SIMULATION ALSO HAS PERFORMATIVE BENEFITS FOR CHALLENGING EXPERT GOVERNMENT

KULYNYCH 97 (“PERFORMING POLITICS: FOUCAULT, HADEMES, AND POSTMODERN PARTICIPATION”)

D. OUR FRAMEWORK MUST BE ANSWERED IN THE 1NC – ALLOWING THE NEG TO ANSWER IT IN THE BLOCK SKEWS 2ACWHICH IS LAST CHANCE FOR OFFENCE AND 2AC WHICH IS LAST CHANCE FOR OFFENCE AND SANDBAGS THE 1AR SO I HAVE TO DROP STUFF.

 

-----------------------------

 

 

THE SECOND one would be best.

 

 

Other Ideas i will taken.

 

AIM ME AT "osniperwolfo"

 

I'll talk then. I have almost everything to trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...