About This File
WORKS FOR EVERY RESOLUTION
LAY JUDGES CAN LOVE THIS ARGUMENT TOO â€“ SO DO LIBERAL POLICY MAKERSâ€¦ SOMETIMES â€“ K JUDGES LIKE THIS A LOT â€“ WHITE SUPREMACISTS, PROBABLY NOT.
This File is a strait up head shot disad/2ac frontline to every big stick impact in the tubs, it talks about how fear mongering politics is what allows us to become slaves to principles of unjust tyrannical politics. This can have a couple of implicationsâ€¦
A. the state is bad and it shouldnâ€™t control us
B. Policies should be made but they just shouldnâ€™t be made as a means to fuck over other people, or the justifications should be thought about before passing them.
This is something really good to include in the 1nc, because they probably donâ€™t have adequately blocked out answers to big stick impact turns that donâ€™t start with the words â€œA. interpretationâ€
The impacts are true, and some of the older pieces of evidence actually predicted some of the things that are going on right now in our current situations i.e. the Arab Spring, government shutdown etc.
Even if they win that their â€œimpactâ€ outweighs, odds are theyâ€™ll concede that the impact is a lieâ€¦
Things to know:
1. This is a dis ad not a k, it definitely has some very critical implications to it but it is run as a reason to show why the plan shouldnâ€™t be preferred and why the affirmative is a pair of lying ass hat conservative lobbyists that feast on the souls of dead children. if they run framework against you, this gives you the perfect opportunity to show your judge just how stupid the affirmative is, and itâ€™s a testament to why their framework arguments are too exclusive in the first place.
2. This file also doubles as an answer to disadvantages that claim big stick impacts if you have a middle of the road k aff.
3. EVEN IF YOU DONâ€™T RUN THIS AS THE FILE HAS IT PUT TOGETHER, THESE ARE STILL REALLY GOOD CARDS TO HAVE I PROMISE