25 files
-
"USFG" planflaw
By RyeZOAM
This argument is undefeated at fast tournaments, and is almost a guaranteed win in the instance that your opponents get lazy typing up their plantext. What makes this really strategic is that there are very few (if any) offensive reasons for teams to abbreviate "United States federal government." It functions like a topicality argument, but has some devastating solvency deficits (like the "USFG" being the United States Faceter's Guild, not the federal government--yes, this is an actual thing http://www.usfacetersguild.org/history.shtml)
This file is ready to read, and includes answers to every argument that an Affirmative in this deep of a hole could make. Comes complete with Neg Block extensions of all major 1NC arguments, and by the time the 2NR rolls around, you honestly won't need 2NR blocks. If not an A-Strat, this is simply a file you should have in your tubs.
However, this file is still a good buy if you aren't looking to thrash some poor team on a plan-flaw: lots of the evidence i cut for the block includes arguments about the importance of grammar and ambiguity in policy-making, as well as the relationships between different agencies (which could be handy for people wanting to go hard on the A-Spec debate). Additionally, the Topicality theory blocks contain good evidence that can be applied to any argument with a limits or reasonability debate. Basically, if you are someone who plans on making Topicality, or any other language-based procedural, you should buy this file.
TOC
“USFG†Plan-Flaw................................................................................................................................................................ 1
1NCs................................................................................................................................................................................ 2
USFG 1NC.................................................................................................................................................................... 3
2NC Jazz........................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Overview....................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Solvency 2NC............................................................................................................................................................... 7
Vagueness 2NC............................................................................................................................................................. 8
Limits 2NC.................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Ground 2NC................................................................................................................................................................ 11
A2s................................................................................................................................................................................. 12
A2 We Meet................................................................................................................................................................ 13
A2 Counter Interp—Only our aff is T......................................................................................................................... 14
A2 “Acronyms are all capsâ€........................................................................................................................................ 15
A2 No impact to legal ambiguity.................................................................................................................................. 16
T-Theory........................................................................................................................................................................ 17
A2 Reasonability......................................................................................................................................................... 18
Depth over Breadth..................................................................................................................................................... 19
Potential Abuse........................................................................................................................................................... 20
A2 RVI........................................................................................................................................................................ 21
Grammar good/A2 “This is stupidâ€............................................................................................................................. 22
More evidence/definitional support................................................................................................................................ 24
Violation extension cards............................................................................................................................................ 25
Object of “the†matters—denotes specific actor........................................................................................................... 26
Only Caps when naming specific agencies................................................................................................................... 27
federal government =/= proper noun........................................................................................................................... 28
Capitol G “Government†= ONLY Executive Branch................................................................................................... 29
Executive Branch DA!................................................................................................................................................. 30
Geography................................................................................................................................................................... 32
About the Author: Mason Owen is a freshman at KU, debated 4 years at Shawnee Mission South High, competed on the national circuit, and part-time coaches for national circuit competitors at Shawnee Mission South. He will answer any questions you have about files released via PM or email (mason5855@gmail.com).
24 purchases
Submitted
-
1ar answer to dropped Voters
By Guest
Everyone has been in the position where the 2ac has dropped a voting issue which is meaningless/cheapshot. The arguments are reason why you reject the argument, and gives you some offense on the position in the 1ar.
and for only a dollar, it makes some debates alot more simple.
45 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
A-Spec - Oceans 2014
A-spec is usually pretty silly. However, while doing some politics research for the oceans topic I came across a number of really good cards about bureaucratic agency politics empirically undermining US ocean management/development policy. This means that an engaged discussion about agency implementation is a pre-requisite to aff solvency. These cards are extremely specific and high quality. The coolest part of this component of the argument is that oftentimes the 2AC will just read their generic frontline to A-Spec and completely forget about the solvency debate. So in the block, you can just go for the substantive component of the argument and crush them on presumption + a disadvantage. Judges are often very unwilling to let the aff recover after a mistake like this, especially when you read several high-quality cards supporting your argument. This file is fully prepped with extensions through the negative block. At only $3 it is a high-value deal that you will want to start the year off with.
ASPEC --- 1NC. 2
ASPEC --- 2NC Overview.. 3
ASPEC --- 2NC Solvency Takeouts. 4
ASPEC --- AT: C/I --- Normal Means. 6
ASPEC --- AT: C/I --- All 3 Branches. 7
ASPEC --- AT: C/I --- “The†= Mass Noun. 8
ASPEC --- AT: No Rez Basis---2NC. 9
ASPEC --- AT: Agent CPs bad. 10
ASPEC --- AT: Cross-ex checks. 11
ASPEC --- AT: Infinitely Regressive. 12
ASPEC --- AT: No Rez Basis. 13
ASPEC --- AT: Wrong Remedy / Not A Voting Issue. 14
ASPEC --- AT: No Ground Loss. 15
ASPEC --- AT: No Right To Those Args. 16
Collin Roark is the assistant director of debate at Trinity University and an assistant coach at the St. Mark's School of Texas.
442 downloads
0 comments
Updated
-
Aff Theory Essentials
By PKennedy
Table of Contents
The purpose of this file is explained clearly in the affirmative section of Evazon, but if you clicked on it, you probably know you need it already.
5 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
ASPEC answers
By zomp
here is an awesome card that answers the classice Elmore evidence that people run with ASPEC. I've also included some analytical theory arguments to help you.
24 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
Comprehensive Theory File
Table of Contents
If you have ever read arguments from a theory handbook written from a time during or before the dinosaurs you should be embarrassed. And buy this file! Advantages of owning this weapon:Fully editable- Microsoft word format allows you to add arguments from this file to your existing theory blocks. Impact Comparisons- this file contains something other files wont: impact calculus arguments. Ground over limits. Education over Ground. These arguments win theory debates! And save you prep time. Qualified Authorship- “Just because Austin is a theory God doesn’t mean he will beat us on this intrinsic permutation”-SMS debater shortly before loosing on an intrinsic permutation. I go for theory more than anyone I know. We went for theory in every affirmative debate at last years heart of America. My reputation and record can speak for itself. Guarantee- This file is more than a file it’s a tutorial. I will work with any debater who buys this file and looses a theory debate. *excludes d3 college debaters who will inevitably buy this file. What are you waiting for? But it now!
61 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
Conditionality
By The-Troll
Table of Contents
***Aff Theory Core***......................................................................................................................................... 3
Strat Sheet..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Condo Short 2AC....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
1AR Overview Short.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7
1AR Overview Long................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8
Strat Skew EXT........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Interp EXT.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10
Reject the Team EXT............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11
AT: Counter Interp We get # of arguments.......................................................................................................................................................... 12
***Impact Debate***........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13
Going for Education............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14
***Answers***....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
AT: Rational Decision-making...................................................................................................................................................................................... 16
AT: Neg Flex............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
AT: Condo Inevitable.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
AT: Time Skew Inevitable................................................................................................................................................................................................ 19
AT: Aff Time Bias................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20
AT: Negation Theory........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
AT: Perms Check Abuse.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22
AT: Perms are Worse.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23
AT: 2AR Always Has Options........................................................................................................................................................................................ 24
AT: Dispo Worse.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25
AT: 2AC Should be Hard.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26
AT: Best Policy Option....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27
AT: Real World Policy........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28
AT: Plan Focus of Debate.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29
AT: 2NR Checks Abuse....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30
AT: Cheap Shot........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 31
AT: Add-ons Solve Offense.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 32
AT: Depth Over Breadth................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33
AT: Performative Contradiction Good.................................................................................................................................................................... 34
AT: Reasonability Checks Back Abuse.................................................................................................................................................................... 35
AT: We’re a Small School................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36
AT: 1AC is 8-Minute Defense Against Squo........................................................................................................................................................... 37
AT: We Defend Our Worldview.................................................................................................................................................................................... 38
AT: Clash Checks Abuse.................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39
AT: Condo Increases Education................................................................................................................................................................................... 40
***Condo=Huge In the Round***............................................................................................................................................................................... 41
Potential Abuse is a Voting Issue................................................................................................................................................................................ 42
Theory Outweighs K Framework.............................................................................................................................................................................. 43
Condo outweighs Ontology/Being............................................................................................................................................................................. 44
Theory Outweighs Topicality....................................................................................................................................................................................... 45
Condo Outweighs ASPEC.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46
Condo Outweighs Framework..................................................................................................................................................................................... 47
***2AR***.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 48
Old 2AR Overview................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 49
Large 2AR Overview........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50
2AR Block if they have no Counter-Interp........................................................................................................................................................... 51
Err Aff............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 53
Condo Cards.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 54
***Theory Core-Negative***............................................................................................................................. 58
2NC Condo Good.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59
Long Condo................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 60
2NR Condo Good.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61
2NR They-Go-For-It Condo Bad................................................................................................................................................................................. 62
2NC Dispo Good...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 63
Severance Perms Bad 2NC Short................................................................................................................................................................................. 64
Severance Perms Bad 2NR Short................................................................................................................................................................................. 65
Severance Perms Bad 2NR Long.................................................................................................................................................................................. 66
Multiple Perms Bad.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 67
Timeframe Perms Bad........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 68
Intrinsic Perms Bad............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 69
Pics Good 2NC.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 70
Pics Good 2NR Normal....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 71
Pics Good 2NR Long............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 72
Agent Counterplans Good................................................................................................................................................................................................ 73
Consult Counterplans Good........................................................................................................................................................................................... 74
Multiple Plank Counterplans Good............................................................................................................................................................................ 75
Functional Competition Good....................................................................................................................................................................................... 76
Conditions Counterplans Good.................................................................................................................................................................................... 77
Politics Good............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 79
AT: DA Not Intrinsic............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 80
International Fiat Good with Kick-Out CPs......................................................................................................................................................... 81
14 purchases
Updated
-
Conditionality Bad
By DHSKrantz
Table of Contents
This is a fully blocked conditionality bad file - 2AC, 1AR, and 2AR are limited thought needed. Great for a team learning theory debates and great for a team where one partner might be weaker on theory or word economy than the other. A deal at 5 dollars.
78 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
Consultation Bad
By DHSKrantz
Table of Contents
This is the file that won me a lot of debates against consultation counterplans. These arguments are theoretically bad for a number of reasons and the 2AC, 1AR, and 2AR blocks in this file will make the extension of this claim almost idiot proof.
85 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
Framework
By Guest
This is section 1, because of the size of file limits, this file is divided into two parts.
This is a massive grouping of all the framework arguments, I ran into while debating.
4 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
Framework Answers
By downward747
Table of Contents
These are sweet carded responses to many of the typical framework arguments that you will hear as a Critical team. Many of these cards you probably haven't seen before - and they are cards that I personally use and win many rounds on in college debate now. Also some more external turns to framework. This file is round-tested, ready to go. Enjoy working their frame back at them.
49 purchases
Submitted
-
Framework File
By Guest
Table of Contents
Tired of losing to K teams just because you want to (shockingly) talk about policy in a POLICY DEBATE? Then buy this file.This is a really good CARDED framework file. Every page in the file has at least one card on it.There are answers that can be used against critical affs and k's themselves along with specific answers on about 3 common K authors.If you're wondering about the cost of the file, I'll justify it by saying that these cards are not easy to find. This is a file that you will find very handy.
96 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
framework file
By zomp
Table of Contents
This is a steal! For $8 you get a massive 260 page Framework file. This is a must-have file for every debater's arsenal. It is loaded with frontlines, topicality arguments, and anticipated "answers to" blocks. Check out the table of contents to see what you'll get. Other folks offer to sell a framework file, but none are this comprehensive and as organized as this one.Questions? Email me at zompetti@aol.com
13 purchases
Submitted
-
0 comments
Submitted
-
Good Framework Card
By matt_bostick
This file is just one card, but it is a scanned card from a book. It is a very very good card about why abiding by the norms of institutions like debate is in fact a good thing. It's a card from Alan Gewirth, Mr. Intervening Actors himself, a likely affirmative author in a critical aff. It's also pretty low under the radar. I've read it in a debate once (victoriously) and as far as I know that is the only time it has been read.
65 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
GRAMMAR GOOD/BAD
By Guest
Grammar good.
key to demo - gives you a big impact on plan
grammar bad
turns on grammar
you get racism links and oppression links based on grammar
15 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
In-Depth ASPEC
By Guest
Table of Contents
This file is an in-depth ASPEC file. I say "in-depth" because it goes beyond the shell and has answers to the most common answers to ASPEC. This file will be useful for as long as you're in policy debate.
36 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
0 comments
Submitted
-
Mass Theory File
By jakeswede
This file is a 109 pages, 105 topic theory file. In most theory files it's simply a random assortment of frontlines, blocks and random analyticals that don't always match up. This file is meant to be a cohesive, streamlined approach that makes theory an efficient and flexible tool for students ranging from high school novice to university senior.
It includes in depth answers on most general theory arguments (Counterplan/K statuses, Perms, ASPEC good/bad) and also more rare arguments (abuse good/bad, test case fiat good/bad, reverse voting issues good/bad) and many more.
Too many teams lose easy rounds because they're missing a theory argument or their files haven't been updated in years. With this file that won't be the case.
Below is the table of contents describing all the topics covered; additionally the concept for the file is included to give a better idea of how the file functions.
Below is an example of how the argumentation of each topic works:
Consider for a second the money, time and effort put into the entirety of the debate season. The risk/reward for an 8 dollar file compared to the amount of time/resources your team is going to spend of the rest of the season is well worth it. Besides which, it'll pay off well over 8 dollar's worth.
38 purchases
0 comments
Updated
-
Procedural Killer/Abuse Stopper
By M. Wilhelm
Table of Contents
Simple enough for a novice to understand, yet deep enough for varsity debate, this includes affirmative answers to all of the procedurals that you are likely to see, and they are written to work for any case. Take care of A, E, F, O spec, along with X T, FX T, and other arguments. The abuse stopper contains abuse arguments that an affirmative team is likely to see like New in the 2. This includes 24 blocks and arguments total with a quick reference explanation of procedural arguments in case you freeze mid-round. All blocks/arguments are ready to read as is, there is no need to piece anything together during your prep time. These can also be used any year as written and can be passed down from one year to another.
90 purchases
Updated
-
Rosa Parks
The goal of a theory argument is to present an issue and a route through which we can address the problem. Generally, this route is either "drop the argument" or "drop the debater".
This file is a variant of the latter route, with one significant difference: it calls for the judge to vote against the person who presented the theory argument. It relies on the metaphor of mutiny and rebellion to prove that the best way to solve a problem is to create a martyr that instigates change in the debate community. The less "fair" the treatment, the better.
This is strategic because you can very often beat people who are vastly better theory debaters than yourself by making the debate smaller. It can also function as a great timesuck; you can simultaneously neutralize a very long theory objection with a single turn and also put the ball back in the other team's court.
I also like this argument because it's applicable in almost every round. Any time theory comes up, you can use this file.
There are some drawbacks: one is opportunity cost, in that running this turn prevents you from making your own theory objections. Furthermore, you'll find that many judges have a prohibitively high threshold for such clearly abusive arguments, so be prepared to spend a lot of rebuttal time to win this position.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Table of contents:
Rosa Parks. 1
Shell 3
High Risk. 4
Low Risk. 5
O/V / Extension. 6
High Risk. 7
Low Risk. 8
AT Fairness. 9
Fairness Solvency Turns. 10
Solvency. 14
AT: “Martyrdom doesn’t solve†Gen. 15
AT: “We Solve Tooâ€. 17
AT: “I Have to want to do it for it to workâ€. 18
AT: “Can’t Change Anythingâ€. 21
AT: Offense. 22
AT: “Leads to perpetual Sacrifice / Martyrdomâ€. 23
AT: “Martyrdom / Sacrifice Intrinsically Badâ€. 24
AT: “Death Badâ€. 25
AT: “Your Argument is Islamic Funamentalismâ€. 28
AT: “Metaphors Badâ€. 29
Other Answers. 31
AT: “We’re Dropping the Theoryâ€. 32
AT: Fear of Death. 33
AT: “Martyr Somebody Else†34
699 downloads
Updated
-
SPEED GOOD
By Jamie P
Table of Contents
THIS IS A SPEED GOOD FILE. COMES WITH A PRETTY LENGTHY FRONTLINE, THERE ARE CARDS IN THE FILE. SOME SWEET TURNS. PRETTY SOLID PREEMPTS TO MOST OF THE ARGUMENTS THAT THE OTHER TEAM IS GOING TO BE MAKING. YOU SHOULDNT BE CAUGHT WITHOUT THIS FILE IN YOUR TUBS. IT IS READY TO PULL OUT AND READ, EVERYTHING IS READY TO GO. ANY QUESTIONS JUST ASK.
12 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
Sua Sponte!!!
Table of Contents
This is the argument the affirmative plans must rule with a test case. Sua Sponte is the legal term used when the court rules without one. This file is really really good. Heres whats inside:A written out theory violation that says ruling w/o a test case is unpredictable and hurts negative ground. A counterplan to rule on the next appropriate test case with net benefits. (they will have no answer to this counterplan, and im pretty sure it has never been run in debate... but im young so im probablly wrong)A bunch of disads to ruling sua sponte: legitimacy, due process, judicial discretion, judicial neutrality, activism, etc etc etc. Check out the index. Affirmative answers just in case. This file will more than likely win you a debate next year. Im just sad I will never get to use it. Oh well, maybe next year. Best of luck.
72 purchases
0 comments
Submitted
-
THE ULTIMATE ASPEC FILE (178 PAGES) ***REDUCED PRICE!***
By LilMax
This file is 11-1, and is undefeated on the national circuit.
Complete with 2NR extensions!
Table of Contents
***Shells***............................................................................................................................................................ 7
1NC Shell (Short)................................................................................................................................................. 8
1NC Shell (Long).................................................................................................................................................. 9
1NC Optional CP F Bad..................................................................................................................................... 11
1NC Module for teams that specify normal means in cross-x................................................................. 11
Brazil Terminal Uniqueness.......................................................................................................................... 12
***Overviews***.................................................................................................................................................... 13
2NC Aspec Overview......................................................................................................................................... 14
Dropped Role of the Ballot Overview........................................................................................................... 15
Only Defense Overview Extension................................................................................................................. 16
***AT: Counter-Interpretations***..................................................................................................................... 17
AT: C/I – Normal Means (For teams that don’t specify normal means in cross-x)............................ 18
AT: C/I – Normal Means (For teams that specify normal means in cross-x)....................................... 19
AT: C/I – All Three Branches.......................................................................................................................... 20
AT: C/I “Only Specify As Much As The Resolutionâ€................................................................................... 21
AT: C/I Definition World Heritage Dictionary 2k2.................................................................................... 22
AT: C/I - “We Are The Actorsâ€........................................................................................................................ 23
AT: C/I With No Counter-Standards.............................................................................................................. 24
AT: C/I “The†Is a mass noun.......................................................................................................................... 25
AT: C/I USFG = Normal Means........................................................................................................................ 26
AT: Fiat Chooses Best Actor........................................................................................................................... 27
AT: Only (X) Actor Can Do the Plan............................................................................................................... 28
AT: X Enforces the Plan.................................................................................................................................... 29
AT: X Evidence Says This Is Our Actor......................................................................................................... 30
AT: No Resolutional Basis/Arbitrary........................................................................................................... 31
More Normal Means Cards (1/2).................................................................................................................. 32
More Normal Means Cards (2/2).................................................................................................................. 33
***AT: (X) Checks Abuse***............................................................................................................................. 34
AT: Disads Check Abuse.................................................................................................................................. 35
AT: Literature Checks Abuse.......................................................................................................................... 36
AT: Clash Checks Abuse................................................................................................................................... 37
AT: Cross-X Checks Abuse (Long)................................................................................................................. 38
AT: Cross-X Checks Abuse (Short)................................................................................................................ 39
AT: Disclosure Checks Abuse......................................................................................................................... 40
***AT: Regressivness***................................................................................................................................... 41
AT: Infinitely Regressive (General)............................................................................................................... 42
AT: Infinitely Regressive – Any Sub-Actor................................................................................................... 43
AT: Aspec Is A Timeskew................................................................................................................................ 44
***AT: Agents Bad***......................................................................................................................................... 45
AT: Agent Debates Are Bad For Education................................................................................................... 46
AT: No Educational Benefit............................................................................................................................. 47
AT: Agent Counterplans Kill Topic-Specific Education............................................................................. 48
AT: Agent Counterplans Bad (Cards)............................................................................................................ 49
AT: No Literature on the Agent....................................................................................................................... 51
AT: Agent Counterplans Bad For Fairness.................................................................................................. 52
AT: Exclusion Counterplans Check............................................................................................................... 53
AT: Agent Disads Bad....................................................................................................................................... 54
AT: People Will Leave Debate If Agents Are Allowed................................................................................ 55
AT: Agent Debates Destroy the Public Sphere............................................................................................. 56
AT: Not Real World........................................................................................................................................... 59
***AT: Critical Answers***.............................................................................................................................. 60
AT: K of T............................................................................................................................................................ 61
AT: Procedurals Keep Harms In The World............................................................................................... 62
AT: Aspec Is Biopolitical................................................................................................................................. 63
AT: Aspec Is Imperialist.................................................................................................................................. 64
AT: Rules Bad..................................................................................................................................................... 65
AT: Spanos in ‘4................................................................................................................................................. 66
AT: Aspec Is Metaphysical............................................................................................................................... 67
AT: Advocacy Statement................................................................................................................................... 68
AT: Aspec Is Normative................................................................................................................................... 69
AT: Semantics Turn.......................................................................................................................................... 70
***AT: Aspec Bad***.......................................................................................................................................... 71
AT: Aspec = Overlimiting............................................................................................................................... 72
AT: Encourages Vague Plan Writing............................................................................................................. 73
AT: Specification Arguments Bad.................................................................................................................. 74
AT: “You Would Just Read OSPECâ€................................................................................................................. 75
AT: Steals Plan Focus....................................................................................................................................... 76
AT: SOP Turn (Generic)................................................................................................................................... 77
AT: SOP (Frazier in ‘7)..................................................................................................................................... 78
***AT: Counter-Standards/Voters***............................................................................................................ 79
AT: No Ground Loss......................................................................................................................................... 80
AT: Plan Action Still Predictable.................................................................................................................... 81
AT: No Right To Ground.................................................................................................................................. 82
AT: Education Outweighs Fairness............................................................................................................... 83
AT: We Give You More Ground...................................................................................................................... 84
AT: CIA = Generic.............................................................................................................................................. 85
AT: We Would Have Granted You Your Links............................................................................................. 86
AT: Potential Abuse Is Not A Voter................................................................................................................ 87
AT: No In-Round Abuse.................................................................................................................................... 88
AT: Wrong Remedy/Not A Voter................................................................................................................... 89
***AT: Theory Args***...................................................................................................................................... 90
AT: Reject the Theory Not the Team............................................................................................................. 91
AT: Aff Conditionality Is Inevitable............................................................................................................... 92
***AT: 2AC Clarification***.............................................................................................................................. 93
AT: 2AC Clarification (Short)......................................................................................................................... 94
2AC Clarification (Long).................................................................................................................................. 95
***Other Misc. Answers***.............................................................................................................................. 96
AT: Permute – Do Comparative Institutional Analysis/Specify in the 2AC........................................... 97
AT: Goal Oriented Debate Is Key.................................................................................................................... 98
AT: Kulynych Evidence about “Goal Oriented Debates Key To Subjectivityâ€........................................ 99
AT: Aff Chooses Best Agents......................................................................................................................... 100
AT: “Why Didn’t You Try Out An Agent CPâ€............................................................................................... 101
AT: USFG = Actor............................................................................................................................................ 102
***Extensions***.............................................................................................................................................. 103
Competing Interpretations Good and Reasonability Bad....................................................................... 104
Textual Competition Good............................................................................................................................ 105
No Counter-Interpretation Extension......................................................................................................... 106
Solvency Argument Shell............................................................................................................................... 107
General Conditionality Extension................................................................................................................ 108
Fiat Abuse Extension...................................................................................................................................... 109
Conditionality Bad.......................................................................................................................................... 110
Ext. Solvency Deficit (Elmore)..................................................................................................................... 111
2NC Specification Good................................................................................................................................. 112
2NC Solvency Deficit....................................................................................................................................... 113
2NC Education Overview............................................................................................................................... 114
***Space-Specific Agent Key Cards***......................................................................................................... 115
AT: Asteroids................................................................................................................................................... 116
Asteroids - Many Agencies to Choose From............................................................................................. 117
Turns Aerospace Leadership (General).................................................................................................... 118
Turns Aerospace Leadership (SPS)............................................................................................................ 119
No Solvency (SPS)........................................................................................................................................... 120
SPS Solvency..................................................................................................................................................... 121
AT: Cox Card (SPS).......................................................................................................................................... 122
AT: DoE/NASA Coop....................................................................................................................................... 123
AT: ‘Mission Creep’........................................................................................................................................ 124
***Impacts***................................................................................................................................................... 125
Impact: Policy Failure.................................................................................................................................... 126
Impact: Participatory Policy-Making.......................................................................................................... 127
Impact: Advocacy/Social Change................................................................................................................. 128
Impact: Advocacy/Social Change................................................................................................................. 129
Impact: Key To Understanding Critical Theory........................................................................................ 130
Impact – Policy Education............................................................................................................................. 131
Impact - Plan Vagueness................................................................................................................................ 133
***Theory Extensions***................................................................................................................................ 135
Err Neg On Theory.......................................................................................................................................... 136
New 1AR Arguments Bad.............................................................................................................................. 137
***Going For Aspec In The 2NR***.............................................................................................................. 138
2NR Regular Overview................................................................................................................................... 139
2NR Only Solvency Deficit Overview........................................................................................................... 141
2NR Non-Policy Action Overview................................................................................................................ 142
2NR Ground Overview................................................................................................................................... 143
2NR Education Debate.................................................................................................................................... 144
2NR Overlimiting Good................................................................................................................................. 145
2NR Infinitely Regressive.............................................................................................................................. 146
2NR Topic Specific Education...................................................................................................................... 147
2NR Procedurals Keep Harms In The World........................................................................................... 148
2NR All Three Branches C/I......................................................................................................................... 149
2NR C/I “Only Specify As Much As The Resolutionâ€................................................................................ 150
2NR “The†Is A Mass/Collective Noun........................................................................................................ 151
2NR Resolutional Grounding....................................................................................................................... 152
2NR Agent CPs Bad......................................................................................................................................... 153
2NR Cross-X Checks....................................................................................................................................... 154
2NR Solvency Deficit...................................................................................................................................... 155
2NR No Right To Ground............................................................................................................................... 156
2NR Policy Failure Impact............................................................................................................................ 157
2NR Social Change Impact............................................................................................................................. 158
2NR Understanding Critical Theory Impact.............................................................................................. 159
2NR Policymaking Education....................................................................................................................... 160
2NR CI - Normal Means.................................................................................................................................. 161
2NR - C/I We Are the Actors......................................................................................................................... 162
2NR - AT: No Resolutional Basis/Arbitrary.............................................................................................. 163
2NR AT: Disads Check Abuse....................................................................................................................... 164
2NR AT: Lit Checks Abuse............................................................................................................................. 165
2NR - AT: Clash Checks Abuse..................................................................................................................... 166
2NR - AT: Agent Debates Are Bad For Education..................................................................................... 167
2NR - AT: No Lit On Agent............................................................................................................................. 168
2NR - AT: Agent CPs bad For Fairness....................................................................................................... 169
2NR AT: Agent Disads Bad............................................................................................................................ 170
2NR AT: People WIll leave if agents are allowed..................................................................................... 171
2NR AT: Not Real World................................................................................................................................ 172
2NR AT: Encourages Vague Plan Writing.................................................................................................. 173
2NR AT: Plan Action Still Predictable......................................................................................................... 174
2NT AT: We Give You More Ground........................................................................................................... 175
2NR Vote On Potential Abuse....................................................................................................................... 176
2NR Reject Theory Not the Team................................................................................................................ 177
2NR AT: Not A Voter....................................................................................................................................... 178
38 purchases
Updated
-
Theory File
This is a 50 page theory file inluding fiat good/bad. For the most part all the frontlines are ready to go, you might want to read over them in-case i messed up on changing them over to National Service because its the theory file i used in my last 2 years of debate.
For a file that you will be able to use EVERY round, aff and neg, and EVERY topic from Novice to College, its a steal at 5 dollars.
1 purchase
0 comments
Submitted
Sign in to follow this
Followers
0