can you perm and advocate for whatever the neg is K-ing? I have REALLY good cards in favor of a bunch of K's but like I've always been taught to perm 24/7
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Scott Victor Valentine <scott.valentine@nus.edu.sg> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Scott Victor Valentine <scott.valentine@nus.edu.sg> wrote:
Answering the Disadvantage Lecture I personally think the lectures are very poor but oh well... I didn't actually go too this a friend sent these to me so im going to publish as many as I can so I can put them in the novice center. Up-vote because why not?
I was looking through a debate website and came upon a relevant definition
Lay Judge A judge with little to no experience judging a debate event, also known as "commoner" or "peasant"
I live in missouri or lay judge central if you are close this framework is a good idea if you want to bring a new aspect into how you debate in lay areas. This is an evolving file meaning I take requests and will keep making cuts and expanding when I learn more about what I'm actually looking to do for strategy.
So I am starting to get really involved in reading K's, and have been doing so successfully. My question is, would anyone be willing to trade an actual (not camp made) K, and in exchange, Ill give a K of your choosing? If you were to help out, would you mind explaining the K?
I know there is anti-blackness, orientalism, and myth of the model minority. But is there anything more geared towards middle eastern backgrounds? Have not found many authors on the lit
So in state there are lots of structural violence affirmatives running around, and I was wondering how to respond to them. I know you usually read util or extinction outweighs. There is only one problem they are getting rid of section 215 of the Patriot Act. There is not any DAs that you can run on this. I was just wondering so I have some more on case to run. Thanks.
I am the only policy team on my debate team. My partner and I went to UTNIF last summer so we have a decent grasp on policy so far. We don't have a coach or anyone else on the team with reasonable policy knowledge. I heard that the best way for teams from small schools to be competitive was to become good K debaters, so thats what we're trying to do. Right now, we're trying to qual for state (we're in texas) but idk if that's going to happen. Does anyone have any tips for small schools?
I found Dreyfus' critique of AI where he talks about artificial intelligence in relation to Heidegger. I was wondering if anyone had a card/source that says artificial intelligence is the epitome of calculative thought etc. It seems to me that AI defines everything as resources rather than respecting being in itself. I'm not really familiar with Heidegger/ontology so correct me if I don't know what I'm talking about. I just feel like this would put a cool spin on Artificial intelligence.
Not that I'm building a case or anything.
I know how to run theory, i just don't know how to pace it out. I want to get through it fast in the 2ac but not under develop it.
What do i do?
(if ur cool you will put in 2ac blocks
