Jump to content

Recent Topics
Current Discussions
  • LeKritiker's Photo
    general questions

    LeKritiker - Today, 08:46 AM

    9) no. Depends entirely on the judge and whether or not the other team calls you out: For example, I "shadow extend" a Zizek card I never read on the kritik, but the other team doesn't catch it. This allows me to get a few extra warrants out of th...

  • StreenaSkywalker's Photo
    China vdebate vs. JeanLucPicard

    StreenaSkywalker - Today, 08:28 AM

    alright sorry for big latehere's that 1nccrosssx CX of the 1NC: I have six questions b/ the first two are super short. 1. Status of each off?2. NB to CP?3. On the Cap K, how does your "materialist criticism" connect theory with action? W...

  • NickDB8's Photo
    Intro to Deleuze

    NickDB8 - Today, 05:18 AM

    read his book about nietzsche. Since he's the foundation of much of his thought, it gives a great overview of what's to come. Will I need background knowledge about Nietzsche? I assume so.

  • baudrillbabe's Photo
    Intro to Deleuze

    baudrillbabe - Yesterday, 07:02 PM

    read his book about nietzsche. Since he's the foundation of much of his thought, it gives a great overview of what's to come. 

  • youdidntseeme's Photo
    Why aren't condition CPs plan plus?

    youdidntseeme - Yesterday, 05:15 PM

    Sure, but that potentially allows Aff to gain 2ac infinite quo advantages which is intrinsically abusive. They shouldn't get to add 2 their plan in the 2ac. perms are tests of competition. they don't get to advocate the perm or the quo of the coun...

  • Raj's Photo
    Why aren't condition CPs plan plus?

    Raj - Yesterday, 04:49 PM

    Sure, but that potentially allows Aff to gain 2ac infinite quo advantages which is intrinsically abusive. They shouldn't get to add 2 their plan in the 2ac.

  • youdidntseeme's Photo
    Why aren't condition CPs plan plus?

    youdidntseeme - Yesterday, 04:34 PM

    A point against the perm from originally unconditional affs- the perm makes them a moving target- they never said in the 1ac that they were conditional policy.depends - if the plan text is like "us should negotiate x with china", then the qpq cp could...

  • Raj's Photo
    Why aren't condition CPs plan plus?

    Raj - Yesterday, 03:14 PM

    A point against the perm from originally unconditional affs- the perm makes them a moving target- they never said in the 1ac that they were conditional policy.

  • youdidntseeme's Photo
    Why aren't condition CPs plan plus?

    youdidntseeme - Yesterday, 01:54 PM

    qpq cp vs uncondo aff: ---aff arg: the cp just adds a condition to the plan therefore its plan plus so perm do the counterplan--- neg arg: a) the perm severs out of engagement which must be unconditional <reads interp of "engagement"> and...

  • youdidntseeme's Photo
    general questions

    youdidntseeme - Yesterday, 01:47 PM

    re: shadow extensions i dont think this is something that can be generalized because there are different interpretations of what shadow-extensions are -- i agree that saying "cap causes extinction - thats zizek - the alt solves - thats also zizek"...

Latest Files
Newest blogs