-
Recent Topics
-
- 3 replies
- 55 views
-
- 1 reply
- 94 views
-
- 1 reply
- 264 views
-
- 1 reply
- 226 views
-
- 4 replies
- 276 views
-
- 5 replies
- 343 views
-
- 0 replies
- 336 views
-
Bayernuard vs ronniesportman / Nonegfiat, sfrpeterm, outlier
By ronniesportman, in Virtual Debates and Online Videos
- 79 replies
- 2222 views
-
- 23 replies
- 856 views
-
ODT Round 5: TheTrashDebater versus TheSnowball// DavidGriffith, PailAmbrose, lawsonhudson
By TheTrashDebater, in Virtual Debates and Online Videos
- 5 replies
- 333 views
-
-
Member Statistics
-
Forum Statistics
54803
Total Topics824273
Total Posts
-
Recent Posts
-
By TheSnowball · Posted
Yeah, a K can operate at an ideological/epistemological, in-round level or at a material/hypothetical level. You'd probably want the hypothetical alternative to be in the 1NC but, as misrap354 said, have a framework argument that can resolve your offense. Then you can frame the K in the 2NR adaptively to the 1AR. -
By monkeybusiness · Posted
of course it's allowed. conditionality is unlimited these days! -
ok with that combo red ped could be ur role of the ballot and u can use decol specifically as ur alt; block can make duality of solvency claims -
My partner and I were thinking about running multiple alternatives to one Kritik (Set Col, for example "decolonization" and "red pedagogy") and wondering how one goes about this (Or if they're even allowed to do it). -
By TheSnowball · Posted
You should find a solvency card in the area of the Affirmative and write a plan that does what the card says we should do. I can help you find a solvency advocate if you want to share your idea.
-
-
Top Downloads
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-
Free
-