What Baitalle wrote ^ quality user.   To add onto this, and connect humanism and Hartman's thoughts, Hartman believes that "empathy" is created when people view the spectacle of Black violence and slavery. Hartman, argues that people who view documentaries of slavery and violence begin to feel for themselves rather than the genocide(d?) peoples. This "ease of empathetic identification" as Hartman puts it “requires that the white body be positioned in the place of the black body in order to make this suffering visible and intelligible”, meaning the space isn't expanded, merely the suffering is reenacted, arguing that there is a "sadistic pleasure" to be gained from watching Black genocide. She equates spectators to witnesses (although she does acknowledge there is a slight difference). I'd suggest reading Hartman, while also having a background in liberalism. She makes a lot of arguments applying facets of liberalism usually applied to the general "other" to the black body, and it's probably a pretty valuable read for antiblackness debaters. It'll give you hella links, at the very least.

T - Immigration means physical entry (DREAMers are already in the US) any politics DA etc.

realistically  in an overview u want to explain the thesis of your kritik - ie how the world has been taken over by a logic of neoliberal dominance etc . and do impact work after explaining your thesis.  

Me and my partner are debating in the AUDL and our first tournament is on Saturday. We're planning to run the NeoLib K for 4 minutes in the 1NC so that everyone we run against is made just a little bit less happy. I'm the 2N, and I need to write an overview for the K. I realized that I don't actually have any clue how to write one, what it should be like, or what I need to include. Help?

Like how a cross x question should start for example  Are you saying you agree with us... or What is your evidence to... or But why would you say that...